Legal Opinion
The Owego
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 11, 1923No. 7496PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The agreement, Exhibit B, in the cross-libel, is not an assignment of freight money to the creditors, and does not operate as a waiver of lien. The Chas. A. Day (D. C.) 265 Fed. 422; The Hattie Thomas (C. C. A.) 262 Fed. 943. The Steele Steamship Company, Limited, is authorized by Cottle to act as agent for the steamship Owego, it having expended funds and anticipated further expenditures, and Cottle, not being able to pay and being desirous of protecting the Steele Steamship Company, did assign to such company the “freight money,” etc., and when such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Steamer EclipseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. Cornell Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Watts v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Fred I. Putnam and James A. Overman v. Harry C. Lower, John Kadlec, George S. Herning, Edgar L. Peecher, William E. Barquist and Norman L. BunkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- The Thomas P. Beal.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- Cline v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Flota Maritima Browning De Cuba v. Motor Vessel Ciudad De La HabanaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.