Legal Opinion

Watts v. Camors

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 9, 1885PublishedCited by 57 opinions

APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. This was a libel in admiralty by a citizen of London in the Kingdom of Great Britain, owner of. the steamship Highbury, against two citizens of, New Orleans in the State of Louisiana, upon a charter-party the terms of which were as follows : “ This. charter-party, made and concluded upon in the city of New-Orleans,' La., the 7th day of August, 1879, between A. B. French & Co., agents…

Read the full summary

APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. This was a libel in admiralty by a citizen of London in the Kingdom of Great Britain, owner of. the steamship Highbury, against two citizens of, New Orleans in the State of Louisiana, upon a charter-party the terms of which were as follows : “ This. charter-party, made and concluded upon in the city of New-Orleans,' La., the 7th day of August, 1879, between A. B. French & Co., agents for the owners of Steamship High-bury, of the burthen of 1100 tons, or thereabouts, .registered measurement, now due here…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Grat

He stated the facts in the language reported above, and continued:

In this case, as brought before us by the appeal and the cross-appeal, three questions have been argued, which 'may naturally and conveniently be considered in the following' order-:

1st. Is the statement of the registered tonnage of the High-bury in the charter-party a warranty or condition precedent ?

2d. If it is not, is the owner of the ship entitled to recover the estimated amount of freight, that is to say, the sum of $20,-872.50, as liquidated damages ?

■ 3d. If both these questions are answered in the negative, have the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API