Legal Opinion

Boulton v. Laguardia

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Motion is made by defendants to vacate a subpoena and notice of examination directed to Thaddeus Merriman, who it appears is a consulting engineer of the board of water supply of the city of New York, and a similar motion is made to vacate a subpoena and notice of examination directed to Dr. Charles P. Berkey, a geologist, who, it appears, is consulted by the board of water supply of the city of New York and is paid by the city on a per diem basis as and when so employed. The plaintiff has served a cross-motion by which the examination is sought of both witnesses referred to herein. That the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Davidson v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mack v. President & Trustees of the School Board of Briarcliff ManorNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Gluck Realty Co. v. Republic Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wodetzky v. Board of EducationCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API