Legal Opinion
Utility Lines Construction Services Inc. v. Hoti, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 29, 2011No. Civ. 11-93-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Utility Lines Construction Service, Inc. (“ULCS”) brought claims against defendants HOTI, Inc. (“HOTI”) f/k/a Highlines Construction Company, Inc. (“Highlines”), and Diversified Group, L.L.C. (“Diversified”) for fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of contract. (D.I. 1 at ¶¶ 30, 40, 53) ULCS is also seeking enforcement of a guaranty between ULCS and Diversified. (Id. at ¶ 63) In the complaint, ULCS alleges that defendants had knowledge about liabilities associated with the sale of Highlines’ material assets…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christenson v. Freeman Health SystemDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
- Baby Jogger, LLC v. Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a MockingbirdDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Finjan LLC v. Trustwave Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Medley v. BaltazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Telus Communications, Inc. v. Signature Aviation Services CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026