Pigg v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIES, Chief Justice.
Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine of an aggregate weight of less than twenty-eight grams, by a jury which also assessed his punishment at fifteen years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
In point of error one, Appellant contends that the State produced insufficient evidence to prove that he possessed the methamphetamine. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, Houston v. State, 663 S.W.2d 455, 456…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Jackson v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Arnott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nolen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- James Noah Applon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015
- Jeffery Popp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- McCarty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.