Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1930No. 10767PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJones, C. J.

(phis appeal is duly prosecuted from a judgment in the district court of Van Zandt county, canceling a contract between appellant and appellees and appointing a receiver to take into possession and complete all unfinished business that had been undertaken by appellant under the contract and to perpetually enjoin appellant from performing any other work under the contract. The following is a sufficient statement to understand the issues herein discussed:

Appellant, J. R. Duncan, is an experienced and efficient developer of new town sites in oil fields. Appellees J. T. Thompson, E. L. Fowler, V.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hausler v. Harding-Gill Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Duncan v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Hausler v. Harding-Gill Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunt Production Co. v. BurrageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API