Legal Opinion

People v. Bowker

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1988No. D004675PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, Acting P. J.

A jury convicted Leroy Anthony Bowker of seven counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under fourteen years of age (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)) and two counts of oral copulation with a child under fourteen years of age (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)). We decide the court erred in allowing a psychologist to testify on the “child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome.” As we shall explain, Supreme Court precedent requires that expert testimony related to the syndrome be narrowly confined, subject to a proper foundational showing that such evidence is necessary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. People v. McAlpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. People v. NicolausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. J.Q.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API