Legal Opinion

Poulos v. Reda

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1987No. 86-1186PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Manning

Plaintiffs, Thomas and James Poulos, filed an action pursuant to the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 110, par. 9 — 101 et seq.) against the defendants, Ronald Reda and Richard Litwin, d/b/a Power Zone Gym, for possession of the subject premises and rent. The defendants filed a timely jury demand, answer, affirmative defenses and a three-count counterclaim based upon an agreed order entered in a previous forcible entry and detainer action between the identical parties on the same lease agreement. On the day of trial, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Village of Niles v. SzczesnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Rosewood Corp. v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. George W. Kennedy Construction Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Congregation of the Passion v. Touche Ross & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Eric Steven Bower v. E. Michael Jones, Ruth Jones, and Ultramontane Associates, Incorporated, an Indiana Not-For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Snow Ingredients, Incorporated v. SnoWizardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Du Page Forklift Service, Inc. v. Material Handling Services, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Downing v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API