Legal Opinion
Hamelin v. Zoning Board
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 3, 1955No. File No. 51286PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by six plaintiffs from the action of the court of burgesses of the borough of Wallingford acting as a zoning commission. The borough of Wallingford is a specially chartered municipal corporation located within the territorial limits of the town of Wallingford. The borough has had its zoning commission since 1941.
While the plaintiffs are resident taxpayers of the town, none of them are residents, landowners or taxpayers in the borough. One of them, Howard M. Hotchkiss, owns property on the west side of the Hartford turnpike, immediately across from the property in question.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of DumontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Low v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Beard's Appeal from County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Koppel v. City of FairwaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- City of Thornton v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, ETC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.