Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1978No. 874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge: 1

Appellant was charged with criminal mischief. The lower court granted his motion to suppress certain evidence on the basis that the search warrant had been improperly issued. The Commonwealth filed this appeal.

It is settled that the Commonwealth may only appeal from a pretrial suppression order if the question raised by the order is a pure question of law, and if the order effectively terminates or substantially handicaps the prosecution, Commonwealth v. DeFlice, 248 Pa.Super. 516, 521, 375 A.2d 360, 363 (1977) (cases cited therein).

In Commonwealth v. Kunkel, 254 Pa.Super. 5,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KunkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. DeFeliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. BradshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API