Legal Opinion

United States v. Geoffrey Brunick

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2010No. 09-30107UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Geoffrey Brunick appeals his conviction as a felon in possession of a firearm, contending that the weapon was obtained during an illegal search of the vehicle in which he was a passenger. The district court upheld the search as a valid search incident to arrest and, alternatively, as an inventory search pursuant to the Beaver-ton, Oregon, police officers’ impoundment of the vehicle. We affirm on the second ground only.

We review the denial of the motion to suppress de novo and the district court’s factual findings for clear error. United States v. Howard, 447 F.3d 1257, 1262 n. 4…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MbackeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Brunick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Sascha B. Koch v. City of Los Angeles et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API