Legal Opinion
Riley v. Ritz. Riley v. Bull
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 29, 1952No. 11288_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
198 F.2d 82
RILEY
v.
RITZ.
RILEY
v.
BULL et al.
No. 11287.
No. 11288.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 23, 1952.
Decided May 29, 1952.
Miss Mary M. Riley, pro se.
Mr. Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellees.
Before CLARK, PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
1
We affirm. Our affirmance as to defendants Peach, Hoffman and Bull is because jurisdiction was not obtained over them. They were not personally served within this jurisdiction, they did not…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Glass v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- De Arnaud v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904
- United States ex rel. Parravicino v. BrunswickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Farr v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912
- Smith v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Luther O. Troublefield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967