Legal Opinion

Harris Bank, N.A. v. Werner (In Re Werner)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 15, 2008No. 19-05493PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAMELA S. HOLLIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the motion of Defendant Bruce Werner (“Werner” or “Debtor”) for summary judgment on the complaint. Harris Bank, N.A., seeks to avoid a transfer of real property as a fraudulent conveyance. Werner asserts in his motion that the statute of limitations has passed and consequently the transfer cannot be attacked. Having reviewed the papers filed and heard the arguments of counsel, the court denies the motion.

STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The standard for a summary judgment motion is set forth in Fed.R.Civ.P.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lesley A. PARKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS OF ILLINOIS, INC., D/B/A the Helm Group, Inc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. In the Matter of Thomas v. Cassidy, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Apollo Real Estate Investment Fund, IV, L.P. v. GelberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Apollo Real Estate Investment Fund v. GelberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API