Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Laurens v. Rush

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1967No. 42860Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*68Felton, Chief Judge,

concurring specially in the judgment and dissenting from the ruling that the guest in this case was a mere licensee.

Mrs. Dorothy F. Laurens brought an action against Mrs. Louise D. Rush for damages for personal injuries sustained in a fall on the defendant’s steps caused by the defendant’s alleged negligence. The petition, as finally amended, alleged substantially as follows: At approximately 7:30 p.m. on October 24, 1962, the plaintiff entered the defendant’s residence at her invitation to play a bridge game. Adjoining the front door and extending approximately two-thirds…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. McCrory Stores Corporation v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Kreiss v. Allatoona Landing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Maloof v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Pettit v. Stiles Hotel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API