Legal Opinion
Cytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis Gmbh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 15, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-0978Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CYTOLOGIC, INC., and COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 08-978 (CKK) v. BIOPHERESIS GMBH, and BIOPHERESIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 15, 2010) Plaintiffs, Cytologic, Inc. and Colorado State University Research Foundation (collectively, “Cytologic”), filed the above-captioned action challenging the actions and decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the United States Patent and Trademark Office pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146. Cytologic named as…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.