Legal Opinion
Espinoza v. Bank of America, N.A.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 13, 2011No. 3:11-cr-00894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
[Doc. No. 13.]
IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. [Doc. No. 13.] For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
The following background is taken from the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) unless otherwise noted.
In late 2004, Plaintiffs purchased property located in San Diego County at 397 Camino Elevado, Bonita, CA 91902. The purchase was financed with two mortgages, and the mortgages were secured by deeds of trust (DOT…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rex v. Chase Home Finance LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- First CA Bank v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- First CA Bank v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014