Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. King v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1933No. 23966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, C. J.

This action was for in-junctive relief to restrain the defendants from violating, by • producing oil and gas in excess of the amount allowable, what is commonly known as the Proration Law of the state, and the orders, rules, and regulations of the Corporation Commission made thereunder.

The action was instituted by the Attorney General under direction of the Governor. '

A temporary restraining- order was issued and dissolved. The petition was amended, and upon demurrer of defendants the trial' court held itself to be without jurisdiction of the subject-matter. The allegations of the petition…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Oklahoma Cotton Ginners' Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Oils Incorporated v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Russell Petroleum Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API