Legal Opinion
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 29, 1994No. CX-93-1334, C8-93-1560PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions of Paper Calmenson & Company and MAK Oil Company for further review of a decision of the court of appeals, 515 N.W.2d 59, be, and the same are, granted for the limited purpose of allocating the proceeds of the suit brought by the employee against the third party who was entitled to Lambert-son contribution from the employer. The mechanics of the allocation that includes a Lamberbson obligation are that the “third party tortfeasor * ⅜ * should pay the entire verdict * ⅜ * to the plaintiff. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Johnson v. Raske Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Valento v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003