Legal Opinion

Oliver Unemployment Compensation Case v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1959No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

We are here concerned with the eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits of thirty-five claimants who were employed at the Clairton works of the United States Steel Corporation. The Burean of Employment Security and the Referee held that claimants were disqualified under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, Section 402(d), 43 P.S. 802-(d). The Board of Review reversed the Referee and allowed benefits. The employer has appealed.

There is no material dispute as to the facts. Claimants were employed rolling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Byerly Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Dravo Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. TickleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Amico v. Bd. of Rev., Div. of Emp. SEC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. Ashmead v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Lakeview Forge Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API