Legal Opinion

State v. Rearick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 17, 2016No. Appellate Case 2014-001692; Opinion 27654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE BEATTY:

Following the circuit court judge’s declaration of a mistrial over defense counsel’s objection, Bryan Rearick moved to bar subsequent prosecution of the charge of felony driving under the influence resulting in death (“felony DUI”) on the ground a second trial would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the South Carolina and United States Constitutions. 1 Rearick appeals the judge’s order denying this motion, arguing: (1) the denial of a motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds is immediately appealable; and, if so, (2) the judge’s declaration of a mistrial was erroneous…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Broderick Seay, Jr. v. Al CannonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. State v. LooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  3. Broderick Seay, Jr. v. Al CannonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. SC Coastal Conservation League v. Dominion EnergySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. HardinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API