Legal Opinion
Travis v. Ward
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1891No. 114PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam Cov/rdy, The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
— It is alleged by the complaint in this case that appellant W. C. Williams entered into a contract with appellants Robert Travis, Alfred Lee and J, S. Maxfield, the board of county commissioners of Clallam county, and purporting to act in behalf of said county therein, to improve a certain highway or county road; and that said commissioners issued to said Williams county warrants therefor in the sum of §13,800.95. It is further alleged that the total valuation of the assessable property of said county at that time was but §501,267, and that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sleeper v. Bullen & DustinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Brown v. County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Weber v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vickery v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Cluggish v. KoonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Halleck v. BresnahenWyoming Supreme Court · 1883
- Edmonds Land Co. v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Tacoma Land Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896