Bonthron v. Phœnix Light & Fuel Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
ERROR to the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.
The plaintiffs in error brought an action in the district court to recover damages for the death of their son, caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant company. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are residents of the province of Ontario, Dominion of Canada, and that the decedent, their son, was of the age of twenty-five years at the time of his death, and left surviving him his parents, these plaintiffs, but no wife or children; that no administrator has been appointed; and that the plaintiffs, being the only-parties entitled to bring the action, bring it jointly for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Mulhall v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Peabody v. HamiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Deni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & PowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Romano v. Capital City Brick & Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. OsgoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Low Moor Iron Co. v. La Bianca's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.