Legal Opinion

In re HIV Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 16, 2021No. 3:19-cv-02573Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STALEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING END-PAYOR 9 v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL 10 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 Defendants. Docket No. 629 12 13 14 Plaintiffs1 have filed a motion seeking relief from Judge Beeler’s discovery orders of May 15 21 and June 14, 2021. See Docket Nos. 590, 623 (orders). In the orders, Judge Beeler found that 16 Janssen had properly asserted the attorney-client privilege as to certain documents (or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Donald Rehling v. The City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tei Fu CHEN; The Sunrider Corporation, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
  5. Schmidt v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API