Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1974No. Civ. 41434PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Plaintiff (appellant herein) was employed by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (MGM), as a regular chief set electrician. He was laid off from work effective February 12, 1971. He contended that the discharge was in violation of a clause of a collective bargaining agreement allegedly guaranteeing his employment. Grievance procedures initiated by plaintiff and his local union, Local 728, Studio Electrical Technicians (Local 728), of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Machine Operators of the United States and Canada (IATSE), were terminated at…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beck v. American Health Group International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Logan v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Aragon-Haas v. Family Security Insurance ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Johnson v. Hydraulic Research & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Giffin v. United Transportation UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.