Legal Opinion
United States Hoffman Machinery Corp. v. Modern Pressing Appliances, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1929No. 3968PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The defendant makes application for a bill of particulars pursuant to Equity Rule 20, and demands:
*992“(1) The names and addresses of the persons by whom the products of plaintiff and its predecessors have been adopted and specified and used, as standard pressing equipment.
“(2) The names and addresses of the persons to whom it is claimed the defendant offered for sale or sold pressing machines not made by plaintiff which the defendant represented as made by plaintiff and the dates when and the persons to whom such misrepresentations were made; and in each instance the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bradley v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Munger v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Page Steel & Wire Co. v. Blair Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- Williams v. PopeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jacobs v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940