Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 24, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Alonzo Jackson prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of conviction against him for the crime of unlawfully making mash, in violation of the statute.

The first assignment of error questions the sufficiency of the indictment. The defect complained of is in the following:

“The defendant, Alonzo Jackson, in the county, district and State aforesaid, on the 2d day of February, 1923, unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously did make mask, wort and wash fit for the distillation and the manufacture of alcoholic liquor, the said Alonzo Jackson not being a person authorized under the laws of the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Digiacomo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Hyde and Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API