Walker v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Conway Circuit Court. G-. S. CuNNinghaM, Circuit Judge-
1Opinion of the CourtCockrill, C. J.
The sufficiency of the indictment is the:, only question presented by the record. Omitting the formal parts, the indictment charges that Walker, the appellant* “feloniously did steal, take and away” one hog, the property of P. H. James, against the peace and dignity of the state.
After conviction and sentence, the defendant moved to. arrest the judgment — upon what ground the record does not' disclose.
1. Indictment: Fohog stealing: Allegation of value. 1. There is no allegation of the value of the hog alleged to-^ave been stolen, but as hog stealing is a statutory felony, without regard to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- People v. TownsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- Davis v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mizell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Scoggins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Keeton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Kightlinger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.