State Ex Rel. Owens v. Chaplin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J., and Seawell, J.,
considering the petition to rehear.
The appeal was originally argued here on the assumption that all differences in the evidence, actual or inferential, were exclusively for the referee and the trial court. The petition to rehear seeks to perpetuate this assumption. They both overlook the basic error in the proceeding.
In the first place, the relator “concedes that each of the voters,” whose vote is here attacked, “was duly registered in Tyrrell County and in the precinct in which he voted in the 1946 election.” (R. 270.) And further, “that each of the affidavits…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . CohoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State Ex Rel. DeBerry v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert Elijah Washington v. Michael E. Bumgarner J. Gainey, Officer W.E. McMichaels M. Thomas, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Bell v. GannawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In re Judicial Review by Republican Candidates for ElectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Bell v. GannawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.