Legal Opinion

Kang v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 2006No. 59, September Term, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

899 A.2d 843 (2006)

393 Md. 97

Shin H. KANG

v.

STATE of Maryland.

No. 59, September Term, 2005.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 2, 2006.

Gary E. Bair (Bennett & Bair, LLP, Greenbelt, on brief), for petitioner/cross-respondent.

Shannon E. Avery, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief), for respondent/cross-petitioner.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

HARRELL, J.

We consider here whether it is fatal to a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waiving his right to a jury trial in a criminal proceeding, in the context of this record,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API