Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Nieblas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 22, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 26, 2004, which ruled that claimant was *1194ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was unable to file a valid original claim for benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 527.

Claimant, a clerical aide for a municipal social services agency, was discharged from his employment on October 11, 2002 due to his prolonged absence from work as a result of his incarceration for an alleged parole violation. Upon his release from prison on October 2, 2003, claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of OpokaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of BadrajanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of StennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of BellamyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API