Legal Opinion
Doe v. State Bar of California
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 24, 1976No. C-76-835-CBRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER.
RENFREW, District Judge.
This is a suit to enjoin disciplinary proceedings of the State Bar of California (“State Bar”) against one John Doe on the grounds that they violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Both plaintiffs are members of the State Bar and plaintiff Richard H. Foster is Mr. Doe’s attorney. 1 Defendants are the State Bar, Michael E. Wald, a member of the State Bar investigation committee in Doe’s district, and David L. Frey, Jr., a State Bar Examiner assigned to investigate Doe’s case.
The rules governing State Bar disciplinary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Goosby v. OsserSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whistleblower 14106-10W v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- Rosenthal v. Justices of the Supreme Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Garden State Bar Ass'n v. Middlesex County Ethics CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- John Doe and Richard H. Foster v. The State Bar of California, Michael E. Wald and David L. Frey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Garden State Bar Association v. Middlesex County Ethics CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.