Rehill v. McTague
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery county: Of January Term 1886, No. 275. This was an action of account render brought by Peter S. MeTague against Patrick Rehill for an alleged balance due the plaintiff of 148,819.74 on partnership account, tried under the following written agreement of counsel, drafted by the court at the trial, permitting the jury to find a balance due, for or against plaintiff or defendant, namely: “It is agreed that this action.be tried…
Read the full summary
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery county: Of January Term 1886, No. 275. This was an action of account render brought by Peter S. MeTague against Patrick Rehill for an alleged balance due the plaintiff of 148,819.74 on partnership account, tried under the following written agreement of counsel, drafted by the court at the trial, permitting the jury to find a balance due, for or against plaintiff or defendant, namely: “It is agreed that this action.be tried upon the merits and without regard to the pleadings; that the jury shall determine whether the defendant is liable to…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
The item 'of $1,350, claimed by the defendant against the *91plaintiff having been remitted from the verdict, and thus practically allowed as a credit, the assignments of error which relate to it alone, are eliminated from the present discussion. These are the 3d, 16th, 23d and 24th.
The item of 14,900.37 part of the sum recovered and the claim for which, by the plaintiff, grew out of the second track contract on the East Penn, road between Emaus and Alburtis, was also remitted from the verdict and the assignments relating to that item are also immaterial: these are the 2d, 8th, 15th, 22d and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Stotsenburg v. FrostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Johnson v. Gallatin Valley Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Greenan v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Riley v. MattinglyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1914
- Krick v. Fairy Silk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.