Stocker v. Wells
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
In this action plaintiff sought and secured a mandatory injunction requiring the defendants to remove certain dikes upon their premises, and enjoining them from constructing, keeping, maintaining, repairing, or erecting any dike or dikes that would impede the natural flood-*53waters of the Nemaha River. We reverse and dismiss as to the defendants Lehr, and affirm in part and reverse and remand in part as to the defendants Wells.
The lands involved, besides that owned by the plaintiff, are two separate tracts. One is owned by Frank B. Wells and Eugene M. Wells, minors. The other is owned by Vergil…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conrad v. KaupNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Cooper v. Sanitary District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Faught v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Frese v. MichalecNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Mohatt v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Propst v. Board of Educational Lands & FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Schwank v. County of PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Stolting v. EverettNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.