Legal Opinion

Richcreek v. Moorman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1896No. 1,814PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marion. Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This was an action brought by the appellant to foreclose a lien acquired for the improvement of a sidewalk along the west side of Central avenue, in Irvington, in front of property belonging to the appellee Moorman. The other appellees, except Nora K. Moorman, wife of the said Joel H. Moorman, were junior lien-holders, and made parties to.answer as to their interests.

A demurrer filed by the appellees to the complaint was sustained by the court, and the correctness of this, ruling is the only question before us.

The objections to the sufficiency of the complaint, as pointed out by counsel for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Charlotte v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Edward C. Jones Co. v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Close v. TwibellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Dunkirk Land Co. v. ZehnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Feder, Rec. v. Gary State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API