Legal Opinion

Miller v. Cloney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1927No. 27,376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The principal question involved in this action was whether a certain instrument in form a deed, was in fact a mortgage.

On September 27, 1915, the plaintiff John H. Miller executed an instrument which purported to convey legal title to real estate in Pittsburg, to Thomas R. Cloney, for a named consideration of $2,000. Plaintiff alleged that he owned the property; that a mortgage amounting to $539.75 was about to be foreclosed and the property sold; that being uneducated in the English language, and un*539familiar with business methods and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dusenbery v. BidwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Duffitt v. TuhanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Doyle v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Haish v. PollockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Hunter v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VandruffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. Flitch v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Leeka v. YountSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Bohannon v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API