Miller v. Cloney
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
The principal question involved in this action was whether a certain instrument in form a deed, was in fact a mortgage.
On September 27, 1915, the plaintiff John H. Miller executed an instrument which purported to convey legal title to real estate in Pittsburg, to Thomas R. Cloney, for a named consideration of $2,000. Plaintiff alleged that he owned the property; that a mortgage amounting to $539.75 was about to be foreclosed and the property sold; that being uneducated in the English language, and un*539familiar with business methods and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dusenbery v. BidwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Duffitt v. TuhanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Doyle v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Haish v. PollockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Hunter v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. VandruffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Flitch v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Leeka v. YountSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Bohannon v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957