Legal Opinion

Dehning v. Marshall Produce Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1943No. 33,520PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari to review an order of the commissioner of agriculture, dairy and food revoking a wholesale produce dealer’s license issued to the “Marshall Produce Company and/or Ortonville Produce Company” June 17, 1942, pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, § 27.04 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 6240-18½c).

The writ issued out of this court February 23, 1943. The commissioner filed his return thereto March 10. The record and relators’ brief were filed April 27; respondents’ brief, May 17; relators’ reply brief, May 19; and the case was argued in this court May 26.

The license here involved expired May 31, 1943. A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Klemer v. City RecorderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Moore v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Troy v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. McDonald v. Beverage Drivers & Helpers & WarehousemenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Anderson v. Village of LouisbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. MacKenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Village of Savage v. Minnesota Municipal CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. In Re Township of Glendale, Scott CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. H & S COMPANY v. Minnesota State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. BarrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API