Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Village of Louisberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1913No. Nos. 17,879—(64)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in the district court for Lac qui Parle county to restrain defendant village and members of the village council from granting an application for license to sell intoxicating liquor for the year beginning April 1, 1912. The case was tried before {¡¡vale, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. Prom the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendants appealed.

1Per curiam

This action was brought on March 25, 1912, to restrain the issuance of a liquor license to an applicant therefor for the term commencing April 1, 1912, and ter*529minating March 31, 1913. Issue was joined, the action tried below, and a decision rendered on May 25, 1912, granting the relief demanded in the complaint. Judgment was formally entered on September 6, 1912, from which defendants appealed on September 9, too late for a hearing at the October term of the court. The appeal was submitted on April 25, 1913.

The period for which plaintiff sought to restrain the issuance of a license expired on…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cramond v. AFL-CIOSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Barnes v. MacKenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. State ex rel. Klemer v. City RecorderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Moore v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Troy v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API