McMenamy v. Cohick
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : Carpenter v. Barber, 44 Yt. 446, 448; Conrad v. Janfee Ins. Co., 6 Pet. 268; Druse v. Wheeler, 22 Mich. 444; Stark, on Ev. 813 ; Stewart v. Ball, 33 Mo. 156; Boal v. Morgner, 46 Mo. 50; Ontiatt v. Ludlow, 32 N. J. 239 ; Clark and wife v. Gillet, Law Reg., Jan. 1874, p. 20; Steel v. Johnson, 4 Allen-(Mass.), 425 ; Robinson v. Robinson, 44 Ala. 227 ; Cullen v. Kelsey, 39 Me. 299 ; Carpenter v. Barber, 44 Yt. 449• Sigerson v. Homsly,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : Carpenter v. Barber, 44 Yt. 446, 448; Conrad v. Janfee Ins. Co., 6 Pet. 268; Druse v. Wheeler, 22 Mich. 444; Stark, on Ev. 813 ; Stewart v. Ball, 33 Mo. 156; Boal v. Morgner, 46 Mo. 50; Ontiatt v. Ludlow, 32 N. J. 239 ; Clark and wife v. Gillet, Law Reg., Jan. 1874, p. 20; Steel v. Johnson, 4 Allen-(Mass.), 425 ; Robinson v. Robinson, 44 Ala. 227 ; Cullen v. Kelsey, 39 Me. 299 ; Carpenter v. Barber, 44 Yt. 449• Sigerson v. Homsly, 14 Mo. 74; Cook v. Hacksburn, 45 Mo. 317; Carter v. Alldre, 48 Mo. 302; Add, on Torts, 245 ; 1 Wag. Stat. 495, sec. 26;…
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
The petition in this case states that the plaintiff Louisa is a married woman living with her husband; that on November 27, 1872, she was in actual occupation of a farm described in the petition, as cestui que trust in a certain deed executed October 30, 1871, by which the premises were conveyed to A. J. P. Garesché, in trust, for the sole' and separate use of said Louisa; that defendants, contriving to harrass and oppress her, on said November 27th wrongfully entered upon the premises described in the deed, made a disturbance, broke, open the doors, injured the furniture belonging to her, “…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Fuhrer v. LangfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881