Legal Opinion

Fuhrer v. Langford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the St. Charles Circuit Court, Edwards, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

The petition in this case alleges that, at the date named,. *287plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate described ; that, at that date, defendants, by force, and wrongfully, entered upon said land and tore down and canned away a rail fence standing thereon, worth $250. Judgment is asked for the value of the rails and for treble damages under the statute.

There is a second count, setting out the same facts, alleging that the rails so carried away are worth $500, and that plaintiff, by these wrongful acts, is deprived of the use of a tract of land once enclosed by the fence; by reason of all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dewey v. OsbornNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Case v. De GoesNew York Supreme Court · 1805
  3. Cox v. CallenderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  4. Jackson v. CombsNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  5. McMenamy v. CohickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blew v. RitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API