Fuhrer v. Langford
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Charles Circuit Court, Edwards, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
The petition in this case alleges that, at the date named,. *287plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate described ; that, at that date, defendants, by force, and wrongfully, entered upon said land and tore down and canned away a rail fence standing thereon, worth $250. Judgment is asked for the value of the rails and for treble damages under the statute.
There is a second count, setting out the same facts, alleging that the rails so carried away are worth $500, and that plaintiff, by these wrongful acts, is deprived of the use of a tract of land once enclosed by the fence; by reason of all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dewey v. OsbornNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Case v. De GoesNew York Supreme Court · 1805
- Cox v. CallenderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Jackson v. CombsNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- McMenamy v. CohickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blew v. RitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901