Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maddox v. Queen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1979No. 57154Published

1DissentQuillian, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority holding. The majority found the preeminent issue to be "whether an unemancipated minor child can sue her grandfather for a negligent tort.” They concluded the grandfather "was certainly the head of the household” and "in loco parentis to the granddaughter” and to allow a granddaughter to sue her grandfather under the facts of this case "would violate the public policy of this state.”

I must dissent for two reasons. First, I do not agree that the evidence of record established the grandfather was "in loco parentis to the granddaughter.” Secondly, under…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Griffin v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Chase v. New Haven Waste Material CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Wright v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API