Legal Opinion

Drs. Hill & Thomas Co., an Ohio Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1968No. 17669PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a tax case in which appellant seeks to raise the question of the validity or invalidity of Treasury Regulation 301.7701-2. This Regulation, effective in 1965, 1 if valid, rules out the taxation of plaintiff company as a corporation. The net effect would be to allow the income to flow through to the doctors who are shareholders. The ultimate effect would be to require their taxation on a partnership basis.

Here plaintiff company paid taxes without taking certain deductions and then filed suit for refunds. For the only year in dispute, 1965, the Commissioner tendered not just the refund…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. O'NEILL v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  4. Gay Union Corporation v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Empey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Hugh A. O'Neill and Elizabeth O'Neill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Church of Scientology of Hawaii v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Joshua Jarrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  5. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API