Legal Opinion
Weiss v. Nath
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
*662The plaintiff alleges that the defendant/third-party plaintiff, Ilona Nath, along with the defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and its employees (hereinafter the Merrill Lynch defendants), unlawfully removed funds from an account established under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (EPTL former 7-4.1 — 7-4.13; hereinafter UGMA) of which the plaintiff was the beneficiary. The Merrill Lynch defendants moved to compel arbitration of the plaintiffs claims, and for a stay of the litigation. Nath cross-moved to sever the nonarbitrable causes of action, counterclaims, and third-party causes of action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Castellone v. JP Morgan Chase BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- County Glass & Metal Installers, Inc. v. Pavarini McGovern, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Anderson Street Realty Corp. v. New Rochelle Revitalization, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Arbitration between City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988