Legal Opinion

Hager v. Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 16, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action against their attorney, alleging that he was guilty of “fraud, outrageous conduct, legal malpractice, and breach of fiduciary duty” in purchasing the proceeds of the structured settlements entered by the plaintiffs.

The Trial Court granted summary judgment on behalf of the defendant, after the discovery depositions of the plaintiffs were taken and defendant filed an affidavit of an “investment specialist”.

We begin our analysis by observing that no presumption of correctness attaches to decisions granting summary judgment, Roberts v. Roberts,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Happy Goodman FamilyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Matlock v. SimpsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Berry Ex Rel. Berry v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  4. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. Cultra v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Kelley v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Estate of Ladd v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  4. Basham v. DufferCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  5. Estate of Ladd v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API