Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thornburg v. House and Lot

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1993No. 150PA92PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This is a forfeiture proceeding brought pursuant to Chapter 75D of our General Statutes — this State’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act). There is no question regarding the State’s right to a RICO forfeiture of the subject property. The issue which divides the State and the appealing intervening defendant, The New Bern-Craven County Board of Education (Board), concerns how the proceeds of a sale of the forfeited property shall be distributed in light of Section 7 of Article IX of the North Carolina Constitution, which provides:

Sec. 7. County…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Mussallam v. MussallamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Hodge v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. McKesson v. . SmartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Shavitz v. City of High PointDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  4. Craven County Board of Education v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Donoho v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API