Legal Opinion

Cox v. Jeffreys

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided May 28, 2024No. 8:23-cv-00423Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA FORREST COX, Petitioner, 8:23CV423 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROB JEFFREYS, Respondent. This matter is before the Court on preliminary review of Petitioner Forrest Cox’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Filing No. 1, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The purpose of this review is to determine whether Petitioner’s claims, when liberally construed, are potentially cognizable in federal court. Condensed and summarized for clarity, Petitioner’s claims are: Claim One: The trial court failed to suppress cell phone records and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Michael Hoggard v. James Purkett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Michael McCall v. Dennis Benson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Danny Morris v. Dave DormireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API