Legal Opinion

Steele v. Grahl-Peterson Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Pollc District Court.— Iiow. J. H. Howe, J udge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The circumstances of the plaintiff’s injury are as follows: The north wing of the Statehouse at Des Moines, Iowa, having been partially destroyed by fire the defendants, Grahl-Peterson Company and Herman & Son, obtained the contract for the work of repairing and restoring the building. As a part of the work required by their contract, defendants filled the spaces between the steel beams or joists intended to support the floor of the upper corridor and gallery with concrete of crushed stone and cement which, when completed and hardened, was designed to be held in place by the flanges…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Samuelson v. Cleveland Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Mulchey v. Methodist Religious SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. HengerTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Deaton v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Stupka v. ScheidelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  5. Ciacci v. WoolleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API