Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Monogram Credit Card Bank

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided July 29, 2005No. Civ.A. 98-1823, 99-2603PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

BARBIER, District Judge.

In this long-running saga, Patricia Heaton, on behalf of herself and a putative class, alleges Monogram Credit Card Bank illegally charged interest rates and late fees exceeding those allowed by Louisiana’s usury laws. Monogram and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as intervenor, argue Plaintiffs claims are preempted by federal law allowing a federally insured State-chartered bank to export its home state interest rates and late-fee charges when doing business in another state. More than six years after this litigation began, Monogram and the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aaron v. Illinois National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API