Drabik v. Town of East Lyme
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiffs, John Drabik and Ronald J. Rando, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs’ action as moot. The plaintiffs specifically argue that the capable of repetition, yet evading review exception to the mootness doctrine applies to their otherwise moot action. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs allege the following facts relevant to our resolution of their appeal. On December 17, 1999, the residents of the defendant, the town of East Lyme, passed a resolution appropriating $3.8 million for the construction of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doe v. RoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Conetta v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- In re Claudia F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cameron v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- In re Forrest B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008