State v. Lumley
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Defendant appeals the district court’s “resentencing” him to imprisonment for failing to pass a polygraph test. Defendant argues that although the district court has jurisdiction to order polygraph testing as a condition of probation, the court could not use the results of the polygraph test to revoke defendant’s probation.
On April 4, 1996, Roy A. Lumley pled guilty to three counts of aggravated indecent liberties and one count of criminal sodomy of his minor daughters. At the June 11, 1996, sentencing, Lumley requested a dispositional…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. GumforySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- In Re the Care & Treatment of FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. GarySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.