Legal Opinion

Bell v. Misenheimer

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 2008No. CA 07-1132PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karen R. Baker, Judge.

Appellant Sharon Bell challenges a jury verdict in favor of appellee James Misenheimer brought by Ms. Bell for damages from a car accident. She asserts that there was no evidence to support the circuit court’s instmction to the jury on comparative fault and that she is entitled to a new trial. Her argument has merit; accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

On December 12, 2005, Ms. Bell was driving down Powell Street in Taylor, Arkansas, with the purpose of attending her aunt’s funeral. Mr. Misenheimer was attending the same funeral. Both drivers were seeking…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Keck v. American Employment Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Ouachita Wilderness Institute v. MergenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Ethyl Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Ness v. MalesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. Bank One, N.A. v. Texas Contract Carpet, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  2. Bell v. MisenheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Bell v. MisenheimerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API